On the question
of the border between the Republic and Northern Ireland, Mr Tusk said: "We
will seek flexible and creative solutions aiming at avoiding a hard border
between Northern Ireland and Ireland. It is of crucial importance to support
the peace process in Northern Ireland”. Remember this? A lot has happened since
then but Mr Tusk’s comments were reported by the Guardian during their analysis
of the EU’s draft negotiation guidelines.
His comments sound very straightforward, logical, and
reasonable. Surely no one wants to see a return to the Troubles of the
twentieth century in Ireland. However, can it (and more importantly will it) be
so easy to continue with the frictionless border that Irishmen enjoy today?
The main issue in my eyes is the EU. Not because of the
age-old arguments advocated by leave supporters, but because of the history of
Ireland and its relationship with Britain. Why should the EU know every detail
of the relationship’s checkered past? Do we know every detail of Spain’s
internal disputes with Catalonia for example?
But the difference is that Spain isn’t leaving the EU and
leaving an independent Catalonia inside. But the UK will be leaving the EU and
leaving an independent Ireland inside. Therein lies the problem.
It wasn’t until 1998 that relative peace was finally brought
to Northern Ireland. It can be argued the troubles started well over a century
before that. But for almost 20 years now, Northern Ireland has enjoyed relative
peace and stability. The Good Friday agreement was the product of years of
inching forward and de-escalating tensions that had risen to such great heights
over previous decades that they seemed insurmountable. The power-sharing
executive gave a lesson to the whole Western world in institutionalised
brinkmanship, where even the bitterest rivals could sit around the table and
make decisions for the common good of the country which, unfortunately, is a
rare commodity in modern day politics.
However, the vote on June 23rd has put that
progress in serious danger. Yes, the collapse of the executive in Northern
Ireland in January was not directly down to Brexit. But it is undeniable that
it played a part in Sinn Fein pulling the plug on the executive, as it sensed
the potential opportunity to push for a united Ireland inside the EU.
But having said all that, do the EU really understand what’s
at stake? Do they understand the raw emotion that will be stirred up in
Irishmen at the sight of a return to border checks? These checkpoints epitomise
the fact that Ireland is not united. They are a constant and stark physical
reminder that the country is divided. It will almost feel as if the country has
been divided all over again and it’s hard to disagree with that feeling. But it
won’t just be the raw emotion that is stirred, it will be the religious, social
and historical feelings and arguments coming to the fore once again.
The physical division of Catholics and Protestants will once
again be shown, through the fact that it will be predominately Catholics south
of the physical border, whilst predominately Protestants north of it. Not only
this, but the social issues will again come to the fore. It may be that living
on the current ‘soft’ border means that the closest shop is over the border.
Imagine the sheer impracticality of waiting to be allowed across the border in
order to do the weekly shop. It will be the small things like this that will
infuriate ordinary Irishmen both sides of the border into potentially
considering the lure of Sinn Fein’s united Ireland dream.
Both perhaps the most important factor of a return to a
‘hard’ border will be the historical significance. Both Unionists and
Nationalists have made great strides over the previous decades in making
Ireland work under political division. The co-operation between the Unionists
and Nationalists in Stormont, as well as the London and Dublin Governments is
sensational when you consider the events of around a century ago. But all this
is at risk if the EU do not understand exactly what a return to a ‘hard’ border
would mean for Ireland.
To return to my original point, the reason I say I am most
concerned about the EU’ s response to the issue is because I would hope that
history has taught whatever party that wins the election on June 8th
that Ireland is not a playground in which to play politics in and that the slightest
mis-placed comment could cause serious social disorder. Therefore, I am hoping that whoever is PM will
embark on attempting to find creative and concrete solutions to avoid a return
to a ‘hard’ border in Ireland.
My concern is that the Governments of the remaining 27
nations may not understand or worse, may not care for the peace in Ireland. It
may just be regarded as one more barrier in the negotiations; just one more thing
that the remaining states and the UK do not agree on. But Ireland is more than
that. Not only for the UK and the EU but for Ireland itself.
The Irish question has come so far in recent history; almost
to an extent where it seemed both sides were finally content with the status
quo. However, Brexit has thrown a real spanner in the works.
If Brexit is to be successful in my eyes, it won’t only
have provided the UK with the ability to fully regain its sovereignty whilst
building towards a brighter economic future, it will have also maintained a very
precious and hard fought peace in a seemingly and increasingly marginalised
part of the UK. It is sometimes forgotten that Northern Ireland remains part of
the UK and that the Republic played such a key part in shaping modern British political
history.
Let’s hope we aren’t given a history lesson in Ireland in
the coming years because whatever new freedoms are won from Brexit, the
potential chaos in Ireland will make them look like a drop in the ocean and
unfortunately, not worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment